Mailinglist Archive: opensuse-project (265 mails)
| < Previous | Next > |
Re: [opensuse-project] survey draft for 3rd party software on openSUSE
- From: Andreas Jaeger <aj@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 06:50:01 +0200
- Message-id: <m3ejliitc6.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Silviu Marin-Caea <silviu_marin-caea@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> On Monday 14 May 2007 06:25:33 pm Michael Loeffler wrote:
>
>> and give feedback on the list. After incorporation of your feedback we'll
>> announce the survey to get broad feedback.
>
> * acroread should stay because it's still the reference rendering software
> for .pdf. Although I am very satisfied with KPDF that's the default
> application which opens .pdf
>
> * agfa-fonts have equal metric to MS fonts, if I have the information
> correctly, so they're needed. Note that Red Hat released a set of GPL fonts
> with equivalent metric to MS. They're called the liberation fonts
Is there any problem asking everybody for these? We added these to be
complete...
>
> As a general rule, the more prepackaged software, the better. If SUSE doesn't
> have resources to package some of the not-so-widely-used proprietary
> software, how about the respective vendors start doing that themselves using
> the nice SUSE build service?
The build service is open source only. The feeling we have is that we
spend work on some packages that nobody needs - but if people use it...
Andreas
--
Andreas Jaeger, aj@xxxxxxx, http://www.suse.de/~aj/
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF: Markus Rex, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg)
Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F FED1 389A 563C C272 A126
> On Monday 14 May 2007 06:25:33 pm Michael Loeffler wrote:
>
>> and give feedback on the list. After incorporation of your feedback we'll
>> announce the survey to get broad feedback.
>
> * acroread should stay because it's still the reference rendering software
> for .pdf. Although I am very satisfied with KPDF that's the default
> application which opens .pdf
>
> * agfa-fonts have equal metric to MS fonts, if I have the information
> correctly, so they're needed. Note that Red Hat released a set of GPL fonts
> with equivalent metric to MS. They're called the liberation fonts
Is there any problem asking everybody for these? We added these to be
complete...
>
> As a general rule, the more prepackaged software, the better. If SUSE doesn't
> have resources to package some of the not-so-widely-used proprietary
> software, how about the respective vendors start doing that themselves using
> the nice SUSE build service?
The build service is open source only. The feeling we have is that we
spend work on some packages that nobody needs - but if people use it...
Andreas
--
Andreas Jaeger, aj@xxxxxxx, http://www.suse.de/~aj/
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF: Markus Rex, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg)
Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F FED1 389A 563C C272 A126
| < Previous | Next > |