Mailinglist Archive: opensuse-programming (25 mails)
| < Previous | Next > |
[opensuse-programming] GAS
- From: M Harris <harrismh777@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 16:08:12 -0500
- Message-id: <200704251608.12229.harrismh777@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
I have been writing some routines in assembler using nasm & ld (compile and
link) and gdb for debuggin. I am going to be converting these routines to the
at&t syntax and pass them off to gcc(gas) so that I will have access to libc.
I have been reading about the gcc compiler, and have been examining its .s
files (at&t syntax) which are fed to GAS. GAS is supposed to ship with
binutils, but I do not find it on my system as a separate utility... I use
gcc every day so obviously gas is there somewhere. Can someone please tell me
whether gcc still uses gas? ... is gas internal to gcc now?
Also, I have read rumors that the latest gas code supports the intel syntax...
true?
Thanks
--
Kind regards,
M Harris <><
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-programming+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-programming+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx
link) and gdb for debuggin. I am going to be converting these routines to the
at&t syntax and pass them off to gcc(gas) so that I will have access to libc.
I have been reading about the gcc compiler, and have been examining its .s
files (at&t syntax) which are fed to GAS. GAS is supposed to ship with
binutils, but I do not find it on my system as a separate utility... I use
gcc every day so obviously gas is there somewhere. Can someone please tell me
whether gcc still uses gas? ... is gas internal to gcc now?
Also, I have read rumors that the latest gas code supports the intel syntax...
true?
Thanks
--
Kind regards,
M Harris <><
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-programming+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-programming+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx
| < Previous | Next > |