Mailinglist Archive: opensuse-programming (60 mails)
| < Previous | Next > |
Re: [suse-programming-e] make ignoring changes to source-files
- From: Jerry Feldman <gaf@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2006 08:23:08 -0400
- Message-id: <200606260823.08372.gaf@xxxxxxx>
On Monday 26 June 2006 8:01 am, Michael Dominok wrote:
> Hi List,
>
> Well the subject says it all. "Sometimes"[0] make[1] misses that the
> (c-)sources it should compile have been changed. Quiet a niusance.
>
> Has anybody come across that, too?
The only times I have found that is when the sources might have been on a
different system, such as on an NFS volume. Make uses the date stamp. Over
the years I have used make(1) it has proven to be very reliable, and
sometimes very maddening when I have a complex relationship, subdirectories
et. al.
--
Jerry Feldman <gaf@xxxxxxx>
Boston Linux and Unix user group
http://www.blu.org PGP key id:C5061EA9
PGP Key fingerprint:053C 73EC 3AC1 5C44 3E14 9245 FB00 3ED5 C506 1EA9
> Hi List,
>
> Well the subject says it all. "Sometimes"[0] make[1] misses that the
> (c-)sources it should compile have been changed. Quiet a niusance.
>
> Has anybody come across that, too?
The only times I have found that is when the sources might have been on a
different system, such as on an NFS volume. Make uses the date stamp. Over
the years I have used make(1) it has proven to be very reliable, and
sometimes very maddening when I have a complex relationship, subdirectories
et. al.
--
Jerry Feldman <gaf@xxxxxxx>
Boston Linux and Unix user group
http://www.blu.org PGP key id:C5061EA9
PGP Key fingerprint:053C 73EC 3AC1 5C44 3E14 9245 FB00 3ED5 C506 1EA9
| < Previous | Next > |