Mailinglist Archive: opensuse-programming (84 mails)
| < Previous | Next > |
Re: [suse-programming-e] Is SuSE 64 bit ?
- From: John Lamb <J.D.Lamb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2004 15:17:40 +0100
- Message-id: <41333704.8060104@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Stefan Hundhammer wrote:
A reasonable starting point would be http://www.amath.washington.edu/~lf/software/CompCPP_F90SciOOP.html
since it's mainly in the realms of Computational Maths/Physics/Chemistry that FORTRAN remains important.
--
JDL
On Saturday 28 August 2004 05:07, William A. Mahaffey III wrote:
By the by, I do do some C & (frankly) like it. Almost all new stuff I
write is, in fact, in C (no good w/ C++ yet ....), unless there are
definite speed requirements, whence I go to FORTRAN.
Just curious: Did you do any hard benchmarking to support that supposed performance advantage of Fortran compared to C used in a similar way - i.e. not doing any fancy stuff, just number crunching?
Any pointers, anybody?
A reasonable starting point would be http://www.amath.washington.edu/~lf/software/CompCPP_F90SciOOP.html
since it's mainly in the realms of Computational Maths/Physics/Chemistry that FORTRAN remains important.
--
JDL
| < Previous | Next > |