Mailinglist Archive: opensuse-programming (112 mails)
| < Previous | Next > |
Re: [suse-programming-e] rpmlib questions
- From: Stefan Hundhammer <sh@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2004 19:16:36 +0100
- Message-id: <200403151916.36572.sh@xxxxxxx>
On Monday 15 March 2004 19:09, Filippos Papadopoulos wrote:
> I looked in http://www.rpm.org/rpmapi-4.1/rpmlib_8h-source.html and it
> seems that this file is different from that found in SuSE 9.0. I believe
> that rpm.org is not updated...
That may very well be. You might want to write to their webmaster to get a
statement on that - and if and when they plan to update it.
> Reading RPM sources is a good idea but i dont know if the same API will be
> the same on all distros. Has LSB defined any stable API about RPMLIB ???
LSB doesn't know anything about the RPM lib since (AFAIK) it doesn't specify
anything about a package manager. Otherwise they would have had to make a
decision between Debian's APT, RPM (used by Red Hat, SuSE, Mandrake) and
others. This is beyond the scope of that standard.
CU
--
Stefan Hundhammer <sh@xxxxxxx> Penguin by conviction.
YaST2 Development
SuSE Linux AG
Nuernberg, Germany
> I looked in http://www.rpm.org/rpmapi-4.1/rpmlib_8h-source.html and it
> seems that this file is different from that found in SuSE 9.0. I believe
> that rpm.org is not updated...
That may very well be. You might want to write to their webmaster to get a
statement on that - and if and when they plan to update it.
> Reading RPM sources is a good idea but i dont know if the same API will be
> the same on all distros. Has LSB defined any stable API about RPMLIB ???
LSB doesn't know anything about the RPM lib since (AFAIK) it doesn't specify
anything about a package manager. Otherwise they would have had to make a
decision between Debian's APT, RPM (used by Red Hat, SuSE, Mandrake) and
others. This is beyond the scope of that standard.
CU
--
Stefan Hundhammer <sh@xxxxxxx> Penguin by conviction.
YaST2 Development
SuSE Linux AG
Nuernberg, Germany
| < Previous | Next > |