Mailinglist Archive: opensuse-programming (98 mails)
| < Previous | Next > |
Re: [suse-programming-e] Matthias Ettrich in praise of MS Windows IDE's
- From: "Steven T. Hatton" <hattons@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2004 20:40:27 -0500
- Message-id: <200402262040.27636.hattons@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
On Thursday 26 February 2004 09:22 am, Steven T. Hatton wrote:
> On Thursday 26 February 2004 06:11 am, Adis Nezirovic wrote:
>
> Both of these have code completion.
> www.netbeans.org
> www.eclipse.org
>
> KDevelop has a minimal, but improving code completion for C++. Even
> (x)Emacs has it for SGML. Ettrich is, in principle, wrong about the speed
> of lisp being an issue. Components of XEmacs can and are witten in C and
> recently even C++. The reason why Emacs lacks it is the people who
> maintain it do see it as useful.
Typing in my sleep again I see. That, of course, should read 'do not see it
as useful'.
> On Thursday 26 February 2004 06:11 am, Adis Nezirovic wrote:
>
> Both of these have code completion.
> www.netbeans.org
> www.eclipse.org
>
> KDevelop has a minimal, but improving code completion for C++. Even
> (x)Emacs has it for SGML. Ettrich is, in principle, wrong about the speed
> of lisp being an issue. Components of XEmacs can and are witten in C and
> recently even C++. The reason why Emacs lacks it is the people who
> maintain it do see it as useful.
Typing in my sleep again I see. That, of course, should read 'do not see it
as useful'.
| < Previous | Next > |