Frederic Crozat composed on 2015-11-25 11:43 (UTC+0100):
Felix Miata composed:
Takashi Iwai composed on 2015-11-25 10:52 (UTC+0100):
While we're at it: should we keep the whole prefix google-*? That is, whether google-noto-emoji-fonts or noto-emoji-fonts. I think the latter is enough, but the former is clearer that it's a subpackage of google-noto-fonts.
Why is the string google- in any font package name? Are any of Google's fonts called by fontconfig using string "google-"? I wish openSUSE (DW#4)[1] would align with what other major distros do. Archlinux (DW#9), Linuxmint (DW#1), Ubuntu (DW#3) & Debian (DW#2) all omit string google- from noto font package names.
And Fedora doesn't..
#5, after Mint, Debian, Ubuntu & openSUSE.
Seriously, who care ?
Who cares who made the font if the maker's name is not part of the font name used by apps and UI? Prefixing a font name with its maker's name is unhelpful more than helpful.
Each distribution has its own guidelines..
Does openSUSE even have guidelines for naming font packages? It would be great to have names that cause all fonts to be grouped together by prefixing fonts-, and if that can't be done, at least try to start the package name with the name fc-match and font management apps report. -- "The wise are known for their understanding, and pleasant words are persuasive." Proverbs 16:21 (New Living Translation) Team OS/2 ** Reg. Linux User #211409 ** a11y rocks! Felix Miata *** http://fm.no-ip.com/ -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+owner@opensuse.org