On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 9:10 PM, Stephan Kulow
But why is SUSE then overwriting the (c) part in the specfile? where is "SUSE" doing that?
Greetings, Stephan
Again, it's not a right/wrong question. eg: `vi 1.spec` there'll be a skeleton/template with copyright headers filled, well then a packager may unconsciously write a specfile for SUSE, which later grants free use to the community. And my second part of the question still: If I owned the specfile, what if, I, as the initial author, don't allow it to be freely used any more? like Axei said, the gcc.spec workpiece is owned by me. But, can we create a gcc package without a gcc.spec? a gcc1.spec with "Name: gcc"? that's rediculous if there're lots of people who want to privatize their specfiles :-) Marguerite -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+owner@opensuse.org