On Mittwoch, 2. April 2014, 11:59:28 wrote Richard Biener:
On Wed, 2 Apr 2014, Adrian Schröter wrote:
On Mittwoch, 2. April 2014, 10:51:22 wrote Johannes Meixner:
Hello,
On Apr 2 09:57 Adrian Schröter wrote (excerpt):
I am looking for the counterpart of "osc linkpac".
well, if you indeed still use "linkpac" you are lost here, since no files beside the _link is in you package.
But I hope you did use "branch" command instead as recommended since years.
I did not do anything here. It is unfair to now tell me what would have been recommended to be done by others in the past.
You can not get any mercy here from me. I repeat this at any time on many public mailing lists when someone is mentioning this antic "linkpac" since almost exactly 6 years now.
This is our default and if you ever have released a maintenance update you are aware of this command.
Err, but "branch" and "linkpac" do different things! So don't tell people that "branch" is always the correct thing to do. It's not.
and some lines below I wrote exactly this as a reason why I do not suddenly add a warning there. -- Adrian Schroeter email: adrian@suse.de SUSE LINUX GmbH, GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer, HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg) Maxfeldstraße 5 90409 Nürnberg Germany -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+owner@opensuse.org