On Mittwoch, 2. April 2014, 10:51:22 wrote Johannes Meixner:
Hello,
On Apr 2 09:57 Adrian Schröter wrote (excerpt):
I am looking for the counterpart of "osc linkpac".
well, if you indeed still use "linkpac" you are lost here, since no files beside the _link is in you package.
But I hope you did use "branch" command instead as recommended since years.
I did not do anything here. It is unfair to now tell me what would have been recommended to be done by others in the past.
You can not get any mercy here from me. I repeat this at any time on many public mailing lists when someone is mentioning this antic "linkpac" since almost exactly 6 years now. This is our default and if you ever have released a maintenance update you are aware of this command.
I only try now to clean up mess that OBS/osc has left behind. I could as well recommend you to "just have made" OBS/osc so that no mess could ever happen.
You can als ask for a text edit which does not allow to do program bugs. Merge conflicts is something what always can happen and all scm tools on this planet need to deal with. And mergeing something with something removed is not even handled at all by others.
By the way: I wonder why "linkpac" still exist and can be used without a warning message when users of it can get lost?
there is a usecase for it, but not for what you are doing. And I will not suddenly add a warning there after 6 years. -- Adrian Schroeter email: adrian@suse.de SUSE LINUX GmbH, GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer, HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg) Maxfeldstraße 5 90409 Nürnberg Germany -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+owner@opensuse.org