Sascha Peilicke wrote:
As long as we communicate that in the spec file, I guess Factory review won't have issues with that. So what about the -src sub-packages, do we actually need to ship them at all? If not, I'd just drop that.
As far as I understand the situation, when you use dializer (it is a kind of debugger) you need either sources or +debug_info. And I don't know any other applications. When you compile code with +debug_info, the AST is included into .beam files as metainfo. The second great advance of +debug_info is that crash-reports become much more informative. You can run sasl application with your code (rabbitmq runs it by default). Yet again, it is strange to compile code with +debug_info for production, but... As for me, It is worth to follow Lemenkov's recommendations: 1) compile everything with +debug_info 2) not to compile src (or relaxed version: if maintainer wants to package sources, package them separately as -src). [1] http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Peter/Erlang_Packaging_Guidelines -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+owner@opensuse.org