Hello, Am Montag, 8. April 2013 schrieb Cristian Rodríguez:
On 04/08/2013 02:33 PM, Claudio Freire wrote:
And by extended status I mean something beyond systemd's "yeah, I started it - it ought to be running". Just try rcapparmor status on 12.2 to see how useless asking systemctl is.
Indeed. I'm still waiting (maybe praying helps?) for ExecStatus...
apparmor has to be hooked up to systemd the same way they other LSMs already are, nobody has done the required work though (unlike redhat or intel that paid people to do the work upstream)
Thinking about who could do or pay that - let me have a short look at the history of AppArmor... Long time ago, Novell bought Immunix, renamed their "SubDomain" to "AppArmor" and had a new feature for SuSE Linux [1] and SLE. Some years later, interests changed (for whatever reason) and the AppArmor team was fired. Later some of them were hired by Canonical/Ubuntu, and that's where most of AppArmor development happens currently. Too bad that Ubuntu uses upstart... If the systemd integration can be done in a scripting language (perl, bash etc.) and you want to pay me... ;-) Otherwise someone @SUSE might be the perfect candidate to do it [2][3]. Regards, Christian Boltz [1] I didn't check, but I'm quite sure this happened in the "SuSE with lowercase u" timeframe [2] Maybe someone is still looking for a hackweek project? [3] <BoFH> I wonder how it will work in SLE12 ;-) </BoFH> -- Naja... wo ein Maildir ist, ist auch ein Dateisystem... also ein kleines Shellscript kochen (Gewürze: sed, awk, bash, evtl. auch einfach nur perl) [Sven Schumacher in postfixbuch-users] -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+owner@opensuse.org