On 04/03/2013 07:21 PM, Christian Boltz wrote:
Hello,
Am Mittwoch, 3. April 2013 schrieb Andreas Jaeger:
On 04/03/2013 04:42 PM, Yamaban wrote:
Are you trying to get the SLE support crew mad at you?
You don't need to worry about that,
Does this mean you would accept the following patch in a SR to Factory? (with $something replaced by aaa_base, vim, emacs, whatever)
--- $something.spec +++ $something.spec @@ some,line @@ %build +%if 0%{?sles_version} > 10 + echo "I don't care about SLE" + exit 42 +%endif
No, not at all. I do care a lot about SLE - it's one of my responsibilities - but in this specific context and how the question was asked, there's no need for Yamaban to care about SLE.
I'm looking forward for your answer ;-)
christian, are you satisfied ? ;)
*SCNR*
Seriously:
I know openSUSE packagers don't need to worry about SLE. This is especially true for packagers not paid by SUSE (you can't force them in any way, maybe except "I won't pay you a drink at the conference" ;-)
OTOH in the interest of working together in a friendly way, it makes sense to keep the packages SLE-compatible whenever possible ;-)
Sure. And supporting SLE 11 is fine - if that is wanted for a package and a valid reason to not remove an init file. But if a package is not build for SLE 11, then why should it have an init file? Andreas -- Andreas Jaeger aj@{suse.com,opensuse.org} Twitter/Identica: jaegerandi SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany GF: Jeff Hawn,Jennifer Guild,Felix Imendörffer,HRB16746 (AG Nürnberg) GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F FED1 389A 563C C272 A126 -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+owner@opensuse.org