Dnia sobota, 1 września 2012 17:06:55 Nelson Marques pisze:
2012/9/1 Křištof Želechovski
: Dnia piątek, 31 sierpnia 2012 13:55:06 Dominique Leuenberger a.k.a DimStar> pisze:
Also, the patch tagging / annotation has seen a lot of discussion in earlier threads. I know of currently three ways that are actively being used (with their pros and cons): - No tagging at all - 1 - Line tagging in the .spec file, next to the Patch<n>: entry
That should be encouraged by the Web editor before it is imposed as a requirement.
The web editor is a pile of junk and should become un-available; It's not the first time I see people using the web editor to make packages, and this raises one question... Do the vast majority of those people actually test the packages ? :)
Speaking for myself, each time I repackage something it because the openSUSE package is missing some stuff I need. I do not do it just for the fun of it.
I've actually found packagers with no openSUSE system installed maintaining packages on OBS...
- Full annotation in the .patch / .diff file.
I do not know how to do it with Kompare but you can make a source file comment instead.
Packaging has nothing to do with KDE specific software; Not everyone uses KDE... in most cases patches should be properly formed through git or svndiff... the sad truth is that no one gives a damn...
I use KDE, so KDE-specific software is what I use. Please explain your thoughts on the wiki. Chris -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+owner@opensuse.org