Mailinglist Archive: opensuse-packaging (235 mails)
| < Previous | Next > |
[opensuse-packaging] Re:
- From: Yamaban <foerster@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2012 10:08:54 +0100 (CET)
- Message-id: <alpine.LFD.2.02.1203161002430.6919@rhlx01.hs-esslingen.de>
On Fri, 16 Mar 2012 04:52, Cristian Rodríguez <crrodriguez@...> wrote:
In other words: It would be better to create a "Cinnamon" Pattern?
That or have a look at the Gnome-Shell package and grab the requires
from there?
Can you give a hint about what would be better in your opinion.
Personally I'd like a Cinnamon-Pattern with as little from Gnome3
as feasible and reasonable.
- Thanks, Yamaban.
On 15/03/12 18:17, Nelson Marques wrote:
A few users from KDE are having issues with cinnamon (mainly lack of
packages). Is there a way to pass as requires the GNOME pattern?
no, binary packages must not require patterns, only the other way around.
In other words: It would be better to create a "Cinnamon" Pattern?
That or have a look at the Gnome-Shell package and grab the requires
from there?
Can you give a hint about what would be better in your opinion.
Personally I'd like a Cinnamon-Pattern with as little from Gnome3
as feasible and reasonable.
- Thanks, Yamaban.
| < Previous | Next > |