Mailinglist Archive: opensuse-packaging (267 mails)

["Joop Boonen" <joop.boonen@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi Nelson,

This sounds great. Does anyone know if a wiki page will be created /
updated about how spec files should look like?

As I look at your reply, I'm thinking about SLE(S|D)10  and maybe even
SLE(S|D)11 they won't be handling a missing %clean correctly as their rpm
is 4.4.2.

So I wonder if it's a good idea to remove %clean now?

Regards,

Joop.

On Fri, December 23, 2011 11:25 pm, Nelson Marques wrote:
> With RPM 4.9+ you no longer require the %clean section, it's done
> automatically. There's the new %check section amongst other things...
> Newer versions of RPM shouldn't require either the
> %defattr(-,root,root,-) as they should be doing it by default... and
> if things are like in Fedora, the BuildRoot should be handled
> automatically also (not sure if implemented on OBS).
>
> NM
>
> 2011/12/23 Joop Boonen <joop.boonen@xxxxxxxxxx>:
> > All,
> >
> > I have a question lately I see spec files that have been changed with
> > the
> > remark (cf. specfile guidelines).
> >
> > The %clean section has been removed for example, this doesn't feel right
> > to me.
> >
> > Does anyone know something about the cf. specfile guidelines?
> > Did I miss something?
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Joop.
> >
> >
> > --
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> > To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+owner@xxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
>
> --
> Nelson Marques
>
> /* http://www.marques.so
> Â  nmo.marques@xxxxxxxxx */


-- 
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+owner@xxxxxxxxxxxx