Mailinglist Archive: opensuse-packaging (205 mails)

[Robert Schweikert <rjschwei@xxxxxxxx>]

Thanks to everyone for the help.

On 09/29/2011 05:25 PM, Cristian Morales Vega wrote:
> On 29 September 2011 22:11, Robert Schweikert<rjschwei@xxxxxxxx>  wrote:
> > Thanks for the help.
> >
> > Some questions below.
> >
> > On 09/29/2011 04:38 PM, Dimstar / Dominique Leuenberger wrote:
> > > Hi Robert,
> > >
> > > On Thu, 2011-09-29 at 16:30 -0400, Robert Schweikert wrote:
> > > > The spec file starts out with:
> > > >
> > > > Name:          libswfdec-0_8-0
> > > Don't do that: keep Name in sync with the upstream project name /
> > > tarball name.
> > > You don't want to rename the package with every version bump.
> > Hmmm, I can see that keeping "Name: swfdec", i.e. with the upstream tarball,
> > would be desirable in a way. But then I end up having to define %package and
> > other sections for what is now the "default". This would imply more editing
> > on a version bump than changing the value for "Name:"
> There is a bit of extra work at first, but I don't see any extra work
> at all on a version bump.
>
> > > > this will meet the shared library policy for "libswfdec" :) . I also
> > > > have a section in the spec file for the gtk library; this looks as
> > > > follows:
> > > > %package gtk
> > > > .....
> > > for all libs, use
> > > %package -n libswfdec-0_8-0
> > > %package -n libswfdec-gtk-0_8-0
> > Would there be no complaint if there is nothing packaged for whatever is
> > specified with "Name: ..."?
> There will be, the src.rpm.


--
Robert Schweikert                           MAY THE SOURCE BE WITH YOU
SUSE-IBM Software Integration Center                   LINUX
Tech Lead
rjschwei@xxxxxxxx
rschweik@xxxxxxxxxx
781-464-8147

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx