Mailinglist Archive: opensuse-packaging (171 mails)
| < Previous | Next > |
Re: [opensuse-packaging] Tagging patches guidelines and package building patches
- From: Paul Elliott <pelliott@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2011 13:15:31 -0500
- Message-id: <201108291315.47155.pelliott@blackpatchpanel.com>
On Monday, August 29, 2011 08:04:36 AM Javier Conti wrote:
Debian also has an elaborate patch tagging guideline that seems to address the
same issues:
http://dep.debian.net/deps/dep3/
Revolutionary concept:
Could not you guys get togther and agree on a common format? That way package
maintainers would only have to have one copy of a patch.
Hey, why not just adopt debian's format? It addresses the same issues, and was
created by resonably intelligent SW developers maintainers! It will probably
work! Those guys maintain just as many patches and packages as you do.
It was not invented here?
--
Paul Elliott 1(512)837-1096
pelliott@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx PMB 181, 11900 Metric Blvd Suite J
http://www.free.blackpatchpanel.com/pme/ Austin TX 78758-3117
In the SPEC file, I'd like to implement the patch I made following the
guidelines at:
http://en.opensuse.org/openSUSE:Packaging_Patches_guidelines
Debian also has an elaborate patch tagging guideline that seems to address the
same issues:
http://dep.debian.net/deps/dep3/
Revolutionary concept:
Could not you guys get togther and agree on a common format? That way package
maintainers would only have to have one copy of a patch.
Hey, why not just adopt debian's format? It addresses the same issues, and was
created by resonably intelligent SW developers maintainers! It will probably
work! Those guys maintain just as many patches and packages as you do.
It was not invented here?
--
Paul Elliott 1(512)837-1096
pelliott@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx PMB 181, 11900 Metric Blvd Suite J
http://www.free.blackpatchpanel.com/pme/ Austin TX 78758-3117
| < Previous | Next > |