Mailinglist Archive: opensuse-packaging (216 mails)
| < Previous | Next > |
Re: [opensuse-packaging] upgrading nasm to 2.09.07
- From: Cristian Morales Vega <cmorve69@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2011 13:56:36 +0100
- Message-id: <AANLkTins4x14z3h1ZzMNmogKrUR-Tkr+thkjBzKpMyOp@mail.gmail.com>
2011/3/16 Per Jessen <per@xxxxxxxxxxxx>:
IMHO it makes no sense. I usually use
FAKE_BUILDDATE=$(LC_ALL=C date -u -r %{_sourcedir}/%{name}.changes
'+%%b %%e %%Y')
sed -i "s/__DATE__/\"$FAKE_BUILDDATE\"/" ver.c
But the ver.c.stamp part makes sense, perhaps I should start to use it
:-) (shouldn't my SRPMs been reported as different?)
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx
However, the changelog actually says:
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Mon Aug 30 22:49:25 UTC 2010 - cristian.rodriguez@xxxxxxxxxxxx
- use __TIMESTAMP__ instead of __DATE__ to make build-compare
happy.
So what's the story?
IMHO it makes no sense. I usually use
FAKE_BUILDDATE=$(LC_ALL=C date -u -r %{_sourcedir}/%{name}.changes
'+%%b %%e %%Y')
sed -i "s/__DATE__/\"$FAKE_BUILDDATE\"/" ver.c
But the ver.c.stamp part makes sense, perhaps I should start to use it
:-) (shouldn't my SRPMs been reported as different?)
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx
| < Previous | Next > |