Mailinglist Archive: opensuse-packaging (206 mails)

[Cristian Morales Vega <cmorve69@xxxxxxxx>]

2010/10/8 Vincent Untz <vuntz@xxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> Le vendredi 08 octobre 2010, à 18:57 +0200, Cristian Morales Vega a écrit :
> > 2010/10/8 Vincent Untz <vuntz@xxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> > > Anyway. The thing is that those macros are all nice, but nobody will
> > > think about using them if they don't have rpmlint checks. So I wrote
> > > some checks.
>
> [...]
>
> > As discussed at
> > http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-packaging/2010-08/msg00017.html the
> > installer's people don't really like gtk-update-icon-cache, have you
> > talked with Lukas Ocilka?
>
> I didn't have time yet. FWIW, we can find a better solution later: it's
> a macro, so we'll be able to change it in one place if we find something
> better.

So, what's the final decision? We are at two months from 11.4 release
and the status in Factory seems to be:
- SuSEconfig.gtk2 has been removed
- rpmlint doesn't complain about packages with icons not running
%icon_theme_cache_post

So nothing is running gtk-update-icon-cache, whatever you install from
zypper or YaST. I have not seen the %icon_theme_cache_post macro used
even in the GNOME:Factory packages.
What should I do with my packages that install icons?
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx