Mailinglist Archive: opensuse-packaging (242 mails)

[Marcus Meissner <meissner@xxxxxxx>]

On Tue, Dec 07, 2010 at 11:23:51AM +0100, Cristian Morales Vega wrote:
> 2010/12/7 Marcus Meissner <meissner@xxxxxxx>:
> > On Tue, Dec 07, 2010 at 11:12:04AM +0100, Cristian Morales Vega wrote:
> > > 2010/12/7 Marcus Meissner <meissner@xxxxxxx>:
> > > > On Tue, Dec 07, 2010 at 11:08:33AM +0100, Richard Guenther wrote:
> > > > > On Tue, 7 Dec 2010, Cristian Morales Vega wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > I'm going to update the libogg package and do some cleanup in the
> > > > > > process. My problem is with this:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > # bug437293
> > > > > > %ifarch ppc64
> > > > > > Obsoletes:      libogg-64bit
> > > > > > %endif
> > > > > > #
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Is it needed anymore? Probably bnc#437293 isn't security related? Why
> > > > > > is it access restricted?
> > > > >
> > > > > Looks like the SLES10 -> SLES11 upgrade path.
> > > >
> > > > Yes, where we moved SLES 10 to SLES 11 from ppc32 to ppc64 as base.
> > >
> > > OK. It's my understanding that SLE 10 is still supported, true? (SLE 9
> > > not anymore?)
> >
> > SLES 9 is still supported (regular until mid of next year, perhaps with 
> > extension programs),
> > SLES 10 too for some more years (3 at least).
>
> Thanks.
> "extension programs" are very long? It's difficult to know when this
> kind things can be removed this way.

The above Obsoletes is not really relevant for openSUSE itself, but it does not 
hurt either.

I think you are free to remove it right now if you want to.
 
> Now I would also need to see bnc#93878 (-fsigned-char removed from
> default cflags). This one is less obvious, perhaps should be reported
> upstream...

I dont think this signed char vs unsigned char is an issue anymore.

Ciao, Marcus
-- 
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx