Mailinglist Archive: opensuse-packaging (249 mails)
| < Previous | Next > |
Re: [opensuse-packaging] vim 7.3
- From: Guido Berhoerster <gber@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 21 Nov 2010 14:15:52 +0100
- Message-id: <20101121131552.GS13341@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
* Cristian Rodríguez <crrodriguez@xxxxxxxxxxxx> [2010-11-21 14:02]:
Have you read the referenced mail? This is not only about the
warnings, -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 actually breaks the code in at
least one case and obviously has not been tested with it. It also
tries to obscure what it does from gcc but obviuosly fails at it.
P.S: I'm not trying to defend this kind of coding...
--
Guido Berhoerster
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx
El 21/11/10 09:16, Guido Berhoerster escribió:
vim seems to use some clever optimizations for memory management
which break with -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 so in this case it seems
justified to replace it with -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=1 as recommended
by upstream.
In case this code is really correct (?) only the affected unit, may be
built with "1" NOT the whole package !
Have you read the referenced mail? This is not only about the
warnings, -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 actually breaks the code in at
least one case and obviously has not been tested with it. It also
tries to obscure what it does from gcc but obviuosly fails at it.
P.S: I'm not trying to defend this kind of coding...
--
Guido Berhoerster
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx
| < Previous | Next > |