On 10/28/2010 11:44 AM, Michael Schroeder wrote:
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 11:38:11AM +0200, Adrian Schröter wrote:
The project names are IMHO less important. More important is which packages do interact with which other packages.
Means when two packages have influence to each other, they should get tested together and submitted together.
IMHO the most important thing is that the devel projects should reflect the groups of people that work on the packages.
It makes no sense to create projects nobody feels responsible for.
Hmm; for the storage project I would take over maintainership. After all, it was upon my suggestion that AJ made the proposal. What about the following proposal: Projects storage:fcoe moved network:fcoe storage:testing containing bonnie, dt (currently in my home directory), fio (from project benchmark), blktrace etc storage:scsi containing scsi-eventd, sg3_utils etc storage:iscsi moved from drivers:iscsi Cheers, Hannes -- Dr. Hannes Reinecke zSeries & Storage hare@suse.de +49 911 74053 688 SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg GF: Markus Rex, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg) -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+help@opensuse.org