Mailinglist Archive: opensuse-packaging (214 mails)
| < Previous | Next > |
[opensuse-packaging] Library naming dilemma
- From: Dave Plater <davejplater@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 23 Oct 2010 16:06:16 +0200
- Message-id: <4CC2EBD8.8010603@xxxxxxxxx>
Hi, I'm packaging openCOLLADA which consists of libraries needed by the
soon to be released blender-2.5x. ATM I have the libs in a separate sub
package for each and a devel package. I see that I'm allowed to package
all the libraries in one rpm, which one is preferable?
My other question is - although I've packaged
libOpenCOLLADAFramework.so.0.0.775 in sub package
libOpenCOLLADAFramework0 I still get an rpmlint warning -
libOpenCOLLADAFramework0.x86_64: W: shlib-policy-missing-lib and
libOpenCOLLADAFramework0.x86_64: W: no-soname
/usr/lib64/libOpenCOLLADAFramework.so.0.0.775. What am I doing wrong? I
get these warnings for each lib. Package is at home:plater:blender
openCOLLADA
Thanks
Dave P
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx
soon to be released blender-2.5x. ATM I have the libs in a separate sub
package for each and a devel package. I see that I'm allowed to package
all the libraries in one rpm, which one is preferable?
My other question is - although I've packaged
libOpenCOLLADAFramework.so.0.0.775 in sub package
libOpenCOLLADAFramework0 I still get an rpmlint warning -
libOpenCOLLADAFramework0.x86_64: W: shlib-policy-missing-lib and
libOpenCOLLADAFramework0.x86_64: W: no-soname
/usr/lib64/libOpenCOLLADAFramework.so.0.0.775. What am I doing wrong? I
get these warnings for each lib. Package is at home:plater:blender
openCOLLADA
Thanks
Dave P
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx
| < Previous | Next > |