Mailinglist Archive: opensuse-packaging (214 mails)
| < Previous | Next > |
Re: [opensuse-packaging] Question about the presence of expletives in package libcaca (Further Update)
- From: Stefan Seyfried <stefan.seyfried@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2010 16:17:12 +0200
- Message-id: <20101019161712.41287eb5@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
On Mon, 18 Oct 2010 16:34:27 -0400
Jim McDonough <jmcdonough@xxxxxxx> wrote:
No, it is actually not. When I was still at SUSE, there was a rule
saying: "nothing goes out without a license."
No matter how trivial the stuff was.
While this is a good idea in general, it just gets plain stupid to do this
for every few trivial lines of code.
So I started to use the WTFPL for that. Because it is still shorter than
every other license.
Ok, I admit, I did it not "just to annoy ...", but it was a nice bonus.
Have fun anyway ;-)
seife
--
Stefan Seyfried
"Any ideas, John?"
"Well, surrounding them's out."
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Jim McDonough <jmcdonough@xxxxxxx> wrote:
While this is true, the above example is simply sophomoric.
No, it is actually not. When I was still at SUSE, there was a rule
saying: "nothing goes out without a license."
No matter how trivial the stuff was.
While this is a good idea in general, it just gets plain stupid to do this
for every few trivial lines of code.
So I started to use the WTFPL for that. Because it is still shorter than
every other license.
Ok, I admit, I did it not "just to annoy ...", but it was a nice bonus.
Have fun anyway ;-)
seife
--
Stefan Seyfried
"Any ideas, John?"
"Well, surrounding them's out."
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx
| < Previous | Next > |