Mailinglist Archive: opensuse-packaging (214 mails)
| < Previous | Next > |
Re: [opensuse-packaging] [Ann] New package: pdfgrep
- From: David Haller <dnh@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2010 17:45:35 +0200
- Message-id: <20101001154535.GA2021@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Hello,
On Fri, 01 Oct 2010, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
It will add a require on libpopplerN? So that libpopplerN get's pulled
in when installing the binary rpm? Oh, wait, the automatic require on
libpoppler.so.N should suffice. *hand -> forehead*
-dnh
--
I didn't know it was impossible when I did it.
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx
On Fri, 01 Oct 2010, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
On Friday 01 October 2010 09:02:04 David Haller wrote:
PS: a fine example, why I don't like versioned libfooN packages. In
the set I build for, I'd have to find what distribution has what
from libpoppler4 to libpoppler7 and do a %if 0%{?suse_version}
cascade. Fun? Not. I'd prefer "libpoppler >= $ver" and
"multiversion" should take care of the rest, though one might want
a UI in zypper/yast to manage "multiversion", best together with a
"cleanup" feature to remove old versions (but the last N, for
example). At least, the libpopplerN seem to provide "poppler".
Why are you doing that at all? You should be able to just do e.g.
BuildRequires: libpoppler-devel
and then the rpm will automatically add the dependency on the right library
version.
It will add a require on libpopplerN? So that libpopplerN get's pulled
in when installing the binary rpm? Oh, wait, the automatic require on
libpoppler.so.N should suffice. *hand -> forehead*
-dnh
--
I didn't know it was impossible when I did it.
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx
| < Previous | Next > |