Hi, On Fri, 3 Sep 2010 at 15:50, Dominique Leuenberger wrote:
The line is as simple as: - Type of Patch
will there be a list of patch types to select from or will the patch type be a free form string?
- Patch filename
I think the patch name should not be repeated. It is already mentioned in the respective "Patch:" tag and given a per spec file unique number which the markup line(s) can refer to.
- Whom to address in case of questions re: the patch And a short description.
Putting this all on a single line could easily violate the "lines
should not exceed 80 chars" rule if the description requires more than
a few words. So it should be allowed to continue the description on
the following lines and maybe even mandatory to start the description
on a separate line.
I'd suggest a convention that puts the additonal information next to
the respective "Patch:" Tag, e.g. like this:
Patch0: foo-bar.patch
#P0: INTEGRATION