Mailinglist Archive: opensuse-packaging (80 mails)

[Michael Schroeder <mls@xxxxxxx>]

On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 11:14:05AM +0200, Christian wrote:
> fell over the problem, that perl usually is using other versioning
> scheme than rpm is.
>
> Example:
> Version changes of perl-Sub-Uplevel
> 0.22 Tue Nov 17 05:38:42 EST 2009
>
> 0.21_01 Sat Nov 29 15:24:49 EST 2008
>
> 0.2002 Thu Sep 11 14:33:09 EDT 2008
>
> 0.2001 Tue Sep  9 22:22:40 EDT 2008
>
> 0.20 Tue Sep  9 19:23:35 EDT 2008
>
> perl is using a decimalized versioning, where 0.22 > 0.2002, but for rpm
> it isn't.

That's actually not true:

    perl -e 'print "decimal\n" if v0.22 ge v0.2002'

or

    perl -e 'print version->parse("0.22") <=> version->parse("0.2002"), "\n"'

Seems like the Author of Sub-Uplevel doesn't understand versions.

Cheers,
  Michael.

-- 
Michael Schroeder                                   mls@xxxxxxx
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF Markus Rex, HRB 16746 AG Nuernberg
main(_){while(_=~getchar())putchar(~_-1/(~(_|32)/13*2-11)*13);}
-- 
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx