On 06/18/2010 12:45 PM, Dave Plater wrote:
On 06/18/2010 12:01 PM, Marcus Meissner wrote:
On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 10:04:41AM +0200, Dave Plater wrote:
But I agree: the packaging policy needs an update here, stating when and why the python-prefix needs to be in a package; otherwise we'll never have a clear consensus to give out to our packagers to get this resolved.
@Pavol: if I remember right you were largely involved in most of the packaging policies, maybe you can shed some light on this as well?
Dominique
I think an rpmlintrc is best as I can also make a comment about why it's there.
No No No.
if its just a warning, either fix the package or leave the warning in.
Too much rpmlintrc hurt.
Yes, python- prefix is only needed when the package is a python module. That said I tend to agree with Ludwig that private modules could be installed in %_libexecdir/%osc and not %python_sitedir/%name, but most of upstreams don't do that. -- Best Regards / S pozdravom, Pavol RUSNAK SUSE LINUX, s.r.o openSUSE Boosters Team Lihovarska 1060/12 PGP 0xA6917144 19000 Praha 9 prusnak[at]opensuse.org Czech Republic -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+help@opensuse.org