Mailinglist Archive: opensuse-packaging (218 mails)
| < Previous | Next > |
Re: [opensuse-packaging] Strange build behaviour
- From: Dave Plater <dplater@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 13:32:01 +0200
- Message-id: <4B222DB1.6000609@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
On 12/11/2009 01:16 PM, Marcus Meissner wrote:
11.1 I can suspect "SUSE_ASNEEDED" which is due to static library builds?
Thanks
Dave P
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx
On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 01:08:20PM +0200, Dave Plater wrote:Ok so as a rule, if I get an error with 11.2 and factory but not with <=
On 12/11/2009 12:41 PM, Marcus Meissner wrote:Yes.
On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 12:19:08PM +0200, Dave Plater wrote:Is this the error returned by btape during the build, it's the only one
Hi, I am confused by a strange anomaly in the build service whenThere are asneeded related errors in the build that probably lead to this
building the package home:plater:branches:openSUSE:Factory:Contrib bacula.
When I use rpmbuild to build the package the server rpm includes the bin
bacula-sd and bacula-sd.conf but when I build in the above project the
files aren't found unless I copy them over in the install stage. What
causes this difference in behavior or have I found a bug?
(they do not abort the build, just make it half way done).
At the start of %build do
export SUSE_ASNEEDED=0
Ciao, Marcus
I can find.
Ciao, Marcus
11.1 I can suspect "SUSE_ASNEEDED" which is due to static library builds?
Thanks
Dave P
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx
| < Previous | Next > |