Mailinglist Archive: opensuse-packaging (218 mails)

[Luke Imhoff <luke@xxxxxxxx>]

On Thu, 2009-12-03 at 11:19 -0600, Wolfgang Rosenauer wrote:
> Am 03.12.2009 17:59, schrieb Luke Imhoff:
> > Just have A and B have an explict Provides on the api-version capability
> >
> > Provides: xulrunner-api-version = 1.2.3
> >
> > Of course, name the capability (xulrunner-api-version) to be whatever
> > the api is actually specifying, just make sure the name doesn't collide
> > with an already used name for an rpm or other capability.
> >
> > and have C Requires: xulrunner-api-verison = 1.2.3
> >
> > That will make C require exactly that version of the api.
>
> That was my first idea or in fact is what is already implemented.
> That's not sufficient to what I want to achieve because:
>
> A and B might not have the same api-version provides at any point in
> time and in that case C shouldn't be updated until A _and_ B provide the
> matching api version.
>
> Wolfgang

Then just add Conflicts: xulrunner-api-version != 1.2.3 in C.  The other
option is to have A and B conflict with each other if they don't supply
the same api-version.  It depends if only C needs the same version or if
A and B need the same version too.

-- 
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx