At Thu, 10 Sep 2009 13:52:57 +0200, Marcus Meissner wrote:
On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 01:36:03PM +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote:
At Thu, 10 Sep 2009 13:27:36 +0200, Marcus Meissner wrote:
On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 01:22:34PM +0200, Adrian Schröter wrote:
Am Donnerstag, 10. September 2009 13:19:56 schrieb Takashi Iwai:
At Thu, 10 Sep 2009 12:59:24 +0200,
Henne Vogelsang wrote:
Hi,
Takashi Iwai wrote: > So far, not all (maybe most of) devel projects have tight > communication channels for maintainers, even no dedicated MLs. Thus, > no real consensus has been made wrt how to handle bugs as a group.
True and thats exactly the problem we are facing all over the place. People just not doing anything. I'm not sure why though.
Just because don't know what to do?
As a start, what about to forcibly create accounts for devel-proj maintainers, so that bugs can be assigned to them if uncertain?
What do you mean with creating accounts ?
Do you mean we should define a bugowner in each devel project ?
Yes, I am all in favour for this.
If you create a list you still need the subscribers per list to agree who is responsible, so this just defers the problem one step.
Why do we need agreement? Many MLs (in this case rather aliases) start from people without explicit subscriptions. People can unsubscribe, i.e. step down from the maintainer late if they can't live with that.
The issue is that they will become empty lists at some point in time. And then we would have to take some kind of action,
Yes, we need definitely some checks and controls over the whole projects. Takashi -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+help@opensuse.org