On Jun 19, 09 17:00:05 +0200, Marcus Rueckert wrote:
On 2009-06-19 15:48:24 +0200, Vincent Untz wrote:
Le vendredi 19 juin 2009, à 05:46 +0200, Michael Matz a écrit :
Hi,
On Thu, 18 Jun 2009, Vincent Untz wrote:
Does this mean there will be another external authorative source for this kind of information in the future (thus, the .spec files will be edited automatically again)? Or can the local file that the .spec They will be formatted - to add the changelog for example. but the attributes and the texts do not have another source from what I understood.
Is there any reason we put the changelog data in %changelog since the data is in .changes files??
No. If you did or do that, you're wasting time. %changelog was and will be rewritten from the content of .changes. We for instance never cared for %changelog sections in .spec files, only for .changes files. Simply leave the section empty (I'm not sure what happens if you leave it out alltogether, so just empty it).
(sorry if this wasn't clear, I meant: the build service always adds the data from .changes to %changelog and commits it; I hate that, I want to keep an empty %changelog since .changes is better structured, more readable, etc.)
I think you could add somethign like %changelog (nothing) and then that section does not get updated - not sure if that's the correct syntax, though. Darix?
thats not the obs. those are the autobuild scripts.
Doesn't matter who does it - it simply blows up the spec-file, and wastes space in the packages :)
darix
Stefan -- Stefan Behlert, SUSE LINUX - a Novell business, Maxfeldstr. 5, D-90409 Nuernberg, Germany Phone +49-911-74053-173 SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Nuernberg; GF: Markus Rex, HRB 16746 (AG Nuernberg) -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+help@opensuse.org