Mailinglist Archive: opensuse-packaging (100 mails)

< Previous Next >
Re: [opensuse-packaging] Source links semantics, broken links, and merging
  • From: Adrian Schröter <adrian@xxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2009 13:03:59 +0200
  • Message-id: <200904201303.59839.adrian@xxxxxxx>
Am Montag, 20. April 2009 12:08:40 schrieb Michael Matz:
Hi,

On Mon, 20 Apr 2009, Adrian Schröter wrote:
So it might become an option in future to do the different merge
order as Andreas has described. Practically it means the submitter
has to adapt the changes made by other people to get his stuff
working again. We will see if this works better or not.

That's confused. The three-way merge helps the submitter to adapt his
own changes faster and easier to the changes coming from the link
target packages.

This is not about refusing a three-way merge, this will happen with "osc
merge" also using the diff3 tool.

I know that you think that this will happen, you keep saying that (that
mls will implement something magic that resembler a diff3). The problem
is: It can't be done without remembering the common ancestor. That's what
this whole bruhaha is about.

as written in my mail, you get the third version via the lastworkinglink=1
option.

What we discussed here was in the end the order how the changes get
applied.

No... Sigh, it's hopeless. You don't listen but keep mixing things, I
just hope mls got it.

I think you neither unterstand what Andreas is wanting and we are wanting.

I will call you to end this discussion ...

bye
adrian

--

Adrian Schroeter
SUSE Linux Products GmbH
email: adrian@xxxxxxx


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx

< Previous Next >