Mailinglist Archive: opensuse-packaging (98 mails)

< Previous Next >
Re: [opensuse-packaging] New ncurses version in STABLE, now with thread safe support
  • From: Richard Guenther <rguenther@xxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 16:00:06 +0200 (CEST)
  • Message-id: <alpine.LNX.1.10.0808141559170.3427@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
On Thu, 14 Aug 2008, Dr. Werner Fink wrote:

On Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 03:32:19PM +0200, Richard Guenther wrote:
On Thu, 14 Aug 2008, Dr. Werner Fink wrote:

On Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 02:38:23PM +0200, Richard Guenther wrote:

Shouldn't the shared libraries be split into separate packages
and not simply grouped by .so.6.0 and .so.5.0?

Those libraries *are* splitted into separate packages, we
have libncurses5 for 5.6 and libncurses6 for 6.0.

But you have libncurses.so.5.6 and libncursesw.so.5.6 in
libncurses5 and libncursest.so.6.0 and libncursestw.so.6.0
in libncurses6, right? I was suggesting to have libncursest6,
libncursestw6, libncursesw5 and libncurses5.

This is a nogo because this will cause a huge rate of
bugzillas due missing libraries during build.

I don't think so. How should the shared library packages cause
missing libraries during build?

It will be only the difference between the ABI version
and hold in mind that we have already a libncurses5 and
not a libncurses5 and libncursesw5.

Well, past mistakes are not an excuse for new ones ;)

Richard.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx

< Previous Next >