Mailinglist Archive: opensuse-packaging (139 mails)
| < Previous | Next > |
Re: [opensuse-packaging] New rpm in beta
- From: Stephan Kulow <coolo@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2008 10:14:18 +0100
- Message-id: <200803171014.18873.coolo@xxxxxxx>
Am Montag 17 März 2008 schrieb Jean Delvare:
We could do that, but then we would release half full CDs :)
And the decompression times between lzma -2 and lzma -5 aren't
really worth it. I.e. bzip2 -d is about 3-5 times slower than
either - and the actual speedup depends on your cache size,
older computers will gain more.
So the lzma -2 vs. lzma -5 is really about size vs. compression
time.
For more details, see Lasse's (most likely already outdated)
page: http://tukaani.org/lzma/benchmarks
Greetings, Stephan
--
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF: Markus Rex, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx
I guess we could keep bzip2 compression for STABLE and BETA if
lzma5 is too expensive, and use lzma5 only for released products
which (I gratuitously suppose) see less package rebuilds.
We could do that, but then we would release half full CDs :)
And the decompression times between lzma -2 and lzma -5 aren't
really worth it. I.e. bzip2 -d is about 3-5 times slower than
either - and the actual speedup depends on your cache size,
older computers will gain more.
So the lzma -2 vs. lzma -5 is really about size vs. compression
time.
For more details, see Lasse's (most likely already outdated)
page: http://tukaani.org/lzma/benchmarks
Greetings, Stephan
--
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF: Markus Rex, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx
| < Previous | Next > |