Hi, On Fri, 7 Mar 2008 at 10:39, Lukas Ocilka wrote:
Don't you know any 'better' and smaller (binary size, memory consumptions, less libraries) than the current Xvnc?
maybe we could run a local X server with dummy drivers and use libvnc.so to export it via VNC. libvnc.so is part of the Xvnc package and has only about a tenth of the size of Xvnc binary. Another option might be to modularize Xvnc, so that it becomes a set of "hardware" driver modules for the modular X server. That way we'd save duplicating all the X server code in the Xvnc binary.
* TightVNC
We're already using the vncviewer from TightVNC, but the server is unusable for us, because it is based on a very old version of XFree86, which is not 64bit clean. Also, the "Tight" in the name refers to it's bandwith requirements rather than the size of the binaries, so we might not gain much by using the cu Reinhard --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+help@opensuse.org