Mailinglist Archive: opensuse-packaging (140 mails)
| < Previous | Next > |
Re: [opensuse-packaging] libraries renaming problems
- From: Dirk Mueller <dmueller@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2008 15:27:51 +0100
- Message-id: <200802251527.51520.dmueller@xxxxxxx>
On Monday 25 February 2008, Richard Guenther wrote:
I dislike this idea, because fileprovides cannot be versioned, so you're
loosing vital dependency information.
For the same reason I don't think that filerequires for base packages are a
good idea. unless you want to rewrite and revalidate all scripts in base to
be compatible to the lowest common dominator. A pointless effort.
Greetings,
Dirk
--
RPMLINT information under http://en.opensuse.org/Packaging/RpmLint
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx
the name opened - in the most cases this is sth like /usr/lib/libfoo.so).
I dislike this idea, because fileprovides cannot be versioned, so you're
loosing vital dependency information.
For the same reason I don't think that filerequires for base packages are a
good idea. unless you want to rewrite and revalidate all scripts in base to
be compatible to the lowest common dominator. A pointless effort.
Greetings,
Dirk
--
RPMLINT information under http://en.opensuse.org/Packaging/RpmLint
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx
| < Previous | Next > |