Mailinglist Archive: opensuse-packaging (140 mails)
| < Previous | Next > |
Re: [opensuse-packaging] BETA: watch out for new rpmlint fun
- From: Ruediger Oertel <ro@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2008 14:34:21 +0100 (CET)
- Message-id: <alpine.LNX.1.00.0802151433590.7222@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
On Fri, 15 Feb 2008, Dirk Mueller wrote:
well, I meant to _only_ check requires and not provides.
--
with kind regards (mit freundlichem Grinsen),
Ruediger Oertel (ro@xxxxxxxxxx,ro@xxxxxxx,bugfinder@xxxxxxxxxxx)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Linux Fatou 2.6.24-8-default #1 SMP 2008/02/08 10:55:16 UTC x86_64
Key fingerprint = 17DC 6553 86A7 384B 53C5 CA5C 3CE4 F2E7 23F2 B417
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF: Markus Rex, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg)
On Friday 15 February 2008, Ruediger Oertel wrote:
To be consistent with the "." not being wanted in a package name,
a requires should not contain a "." in the REQUIRENAME unless
that provides also contains a "/".
well, "foo/bar.h" would still be invalid. I've just updated the check to
ignore the path part of split-provides, that should help in this case.
well, I meant to _only_ check requires and not provides.
--
with kind regards (mit freundlichem Grinsen),
Ruediger Oertel (ro@xxxxxxxxxx,ro@xxxxxxx,bugfinder@xxxxxxxxxxx)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Linux Fatou 2.6.24-8-default #1 SMP 2008/02/08 10:55:16 UTC x86_64
Key fingerprint = 17DC 6553 86A7 384B 53C5 CA5C 3CE4 F2E7 23F2 B417
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF: Markus Rex, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg)
| < Previous | Next > |