Mailinglist Archive: opensuse-packaging (150 mails)
| < Previous | Next > |
Re: [opensuse-packaging] Shared Library Policy Questions
- From: Richard Guenther <rguenther@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2008 16:27:19 +0100 (CET)
- Message-id: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0801311625540.7704@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
On Thu, 31 Jan 2008, JP Rosevear wrote:
I would argue for always, as it is usually difficult to later fix
packaging of pkg-1.0 if you want to install pkg-2.0 in parallel.
At least if it is not too much work. (Who wants to install two
openoffice versions in parallel?)
Richard.
--
Richard Guenther <rguenther@xxxxxxx>
Novell / SUSE Labs
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH - Nuernberg - AG Nuernberg - HRB 16746 - GF: Markus Rex
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Additionally, should packages that can be parallel installed always be
packaged as such or only if the need arises?
I would argue for always, as it is usually difficult to later fix
packaging of pkg-1.0 if you want to install pkg-2.0 in parallel.
At least if it is not too much work. (Who wants to install two
openoffice versions in parallel?)
Richard.
--
Richard Guenther <rguenther@xxxxxxx>
Novell / SUSE Labs
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH - Nuernberg - AG Nuernberg - HRB 16746 - GF: Markus Rex
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx
| < Previous | Next > |