Mailinglist Archive: opensuse-packaging (109 mails)
| < Previous | Next > |
Re: [opensuse-packaging] Duplicate -lang packages waste space
- From: Thorsten Kukuk <kukuk@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 08:38:03 +0200
- Message-id: <20071015063802.GA7268@xxxxxxx>
On Mon, Oct 15, Andreas Gruenbacher wrote:
> On Sunday 14 October 2007 21:39:44 Jan Engelhardt wrote:
> > On Oct 14 2007 21:12, Andreas Gruenbacher wrote:
> > >On Sunday 14 October 2007 12:55, Pascal Bleser wrote:
> > >> Andreas Gruenbacher wrote:
> > >> > Why not fix this rpm defect instead? This limitation really doesn't
> > >> > make sense.
> > >>
> > >> You have a patch to discuss with Jeff ? :)
> > >
> > >No, but didn't Jan say he'd volunteer to write one? ;-)
> >
> > I thought Novell was comitted to opensource?
>
> Yes, and not only to this particular problem. In fact the reason why this
> problem hasn't been fixed yet is that there are too many other open problems
> which have higher priority, and so nobody got to this one, yet. We are not
> acting as we do out of ill will, but because of limited resources. I hope you
> can appreciate that.
I think this idea was already rejected upstream, since RPM
has no chance to make sure that the content is really noarch.
If you build a normal noarch package, all arch specific commands
like "ifarch" are disabled and will be ignored. How to do that for
a subpackage?
Thorsten
--
Thorsten Kukuk, Project Manager/Release Manager SLES
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, D-90409 Nuernberg
GF: Markus Rex, HRB 16746 (AG Nuernberg)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> On Sunday 14 October 2007 21:39:44 Jan Engelhardt wrote:
> > On Oct 14 2007 21:12, Andreas Gruenbacher wrote:
> > >On Sunday 14 October 2007 12:55, Pascal Bleser wrote:
> > >> Andreas Gruenbacher wrote:
> > >> > Why not fix this rpm defect instead? This limitation really doesn't
> > >> > make sense.
> > >>
> > >> You have a patch to discuss with Jeff ? :)
> > >
> > >No, but didn't Jan say he'd volunteer to write one? ;-)
> >
> > I thought Novell was comitted to opensource?
>
> Yes, and not only to this particular problem. In fact the reason why this
> problem hasn't been fixed yet is that there are too many other open problems
> which have higher priority, and so nobody got to this one, yet. We are not
> acting as we do out of ill will, but because of limited resources. I hope you
> can appreciate that.
I think this idea was already rejected upstream, since RPM
has no chance to make sure that the content is really noarch.
If you build a normal noarch package, all arch specific commands
like "ifarch" are disabled and will be ignored. How to do that for
a subpackage?
Thorsten
--
Thorsten Kukuk, Project Manager/Release Manager SLES
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, D-90409 Nuernberg
GF: Markus Rex, HRB 16746 (AG Nuernberg)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx
| < Previous | Next > |