Mailinglist Archive: opensuse-packaging (135 mails)
| < Previous | Next > |
Re: [opensuse-packaging] missed -devel subpackage splits
- From: Dirk Mueller <dmueller@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 11:31:09 +0200
- Message-id: <200708231131.09830.dmueller@xxxxxxx>
On Monday, 20. August 2007, Michal Marek wrote:
> during 10.3 development, many library packages were renamed and/or split
> into a runtime and devel subpackage. The former doesn't cause any pain,
> as the *.so provides / requires stay the same.
Thats a very nice idea for a build check. You should have submitted it as a
rpmlint enhancement request ;)
I've added a small variation of this check to rpmlint now. Please watch out
for the checks "non-devel-buildrequires" and "unnecessary-buildrequires"
Greetings,
Dirk
--
RPMLINT information under http://en.opensuse.org/Packaging/RpmLint
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> during 10.3 development, many library packages were renamed and/or split
> into a runtime and devel subpackage. The former doesn't cause any pain,
> as the *.so provides / requires stay the same.
Thats a very nice idea for a build check. You should have submitted it as a
rpmlint enhancement request ;)
I've added a small variation of this check to rpmlint now. Please watch out
for the checks "non-devel-buildrequires" and "unnecessary-buildrequires"
Greetings,
Dirk
--
RPMLINT information under http://en.opensuse.org/Packaging/RpmLint
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx
| < Previous | Next > |