Mailinglist Archive: opensuse-packaging (135 mails)
| < Previous | Next > |
Re: [opensuse-packaging] dropping jabberd from distribution (what about gimp-unstable)
- From: "Michel Salim" <michel.sylvan@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2007 16:24:14 +0700
- Message-id: <f224c6140708090224v63731287i302a5cc33b758029@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
On 09/08/07, Daniel Rahn <Daniel.Rahn@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 09, Michel Salim wrote:
> > It is quite bad, in that it does not integrate well with some packages
> > from stock openSUSE-10.2.
>
> I have to admit I don't quite get why an epiphany user should be
> interested in updating Mozilla packages. What would be the reason to do
> so?
>
To use Sunbird, or some other stand-alone Mozilla product?
As Wolfgang answered, the conflict is because epiphany depends on a
certain version of mozilla-xulrunner, and the Mozilla repo provides a
newer version.
Cheers,
--
Michel
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> On Thu, Aug 09, Michel Salim wrote:
> > It is quite bad, in that it does not integrate well with some packages
> > from stock openSUSE-10.2.
>
> I have to admit I don't quite get why an epiphany user should be
> interested in updating Mozilla packages. What would be the reason to do
> so?
>
To use Sunbird, or some other stand-alone Mozilla product?
As Wolfgang answered, the conflict is because epiphany depends on a
certain version of mozilla-xulrunner, and the Mozilla repo provides a
newer version.
Cheers,
--
Michel
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx
| < Previous | Next > |