Mailinglist Archive: opensuse-packaging (105 mails)
| < Previous | Next > |
Re: [opensuse-packaging] policy for naming devel packages
- From: Stefan Dirsch <sndirsch@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 17:41:22 +0200
- Message-id: <20070523154122.GA17791@xxxxxxx>
On Wed, May 23, 2007 at 04:37:56PM +0200, Michael Matz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, 23 May 2007, Dirk Mueller wrote:
>
> > it was recently (in bugreport 277317) brought to my attention that we
> > have three packages containing development files, but not being named
> > with a "-devel" suffix:
> >
>
> > wnn-sdk
>
> This is not a subpackage of something, but really a package in it's own.
> IOW upstream calls it like so, we shouldn't differ without good reasons,
> so this name would be IMO okay.
>
> > OpenOffice_org-sdk
> > xorg-x11-server-sdk
>
> About these I'm less sure. The xorg-x11-server-sdk indeed only contains
> stuff you usually would expect from your random -devel package. In one
> way it's different: this package is for developing other X11 server code,
> not for normal developers doing X11 stuff, i.e. more or less an artifact
> of the big split of X11 into modules (I realize that this characterization
> is a bit stretching). It could reasonably be named xorg-x11-server-devel,
> but I don't see a big reason to enforce that name. It's not that anyone
> who doesn't know the current name would want to have it.
>
> OpenOffice_org-sdk could also be named -devel I think. It mostly contains
> IDL defs and UNO interfaces. OTOH it doesn't contain libraries to
> directly link against, something which I would expect in a random -devel
> package.
>
> > I was wondering if there is a special policy regarding the -sdk suffix
> > that I'm not aware of? Shouldn't those packages be named -devel?
It's not a policy, but xorg-x11-server-sdk is the package name, that
other distributors use for these files as well. I'm not aware of
anyone using xorg-x11-server-devel. I don't see much benefit for
renaming it besides from confusing our customers by constantling
renaming our X11 packages.
Best regards,
Stefan
Public Key available
------------------------------------------------------
Stefan Dirsch (Res. & Dev.) SUSE LINUX Products GmbH
Tel: 0911-740 53 0 Maxfeldstraße 5
FAX: 0911-740 53 479 D-90409 Nürnberg
http://www.suse.de Germany
-----------------------------------------------------------------
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF: Markus Rex, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg)
-----------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, 23 May 2007, Dirk Mueller wrote:
>
> > it was recently (in bugreport 277317) brought to my attention that we
> > have three packages containing development files, but not being named
> > with a "-devel" suffix:
> >
>
> > wnn-sdk
>
> This is not a subpackage of something, but really a package in it's own.
> IOW upstream calls it like so, we shouldn't differ without good reasons,
> so this name would be IMO okay.
>
> > OpenOffice_org-sdk
> > xorg-x11-server-sdk
>
> About these I'm less sure. The xorg-x11-server-sdk indeed only contains
> stuff you usually would expect from your random -devel package. In one
> way it's different: this package is for developing other X11 server code,
> not for normal developers doing X11 stuff, i.e. more or less an artifact
> of the big split of X11 into modules (I realize that this characterization
> is a bit stretching). It could reasonably be named xorg-x11-server-devel,
> but I don't see a big reason to enforce that name. It's not that anyone
> who doesn't know the current name would want to have it.
>
> OpenOffice_org-sdk could also be named -devel I think. It mostly contains
> IDL defs and UNO interfaces. OTOH it doesn't contain libraries to
> directly link against, something which I would expect in a random -devel
> package.
>
> > I was wondering if there is a special policy regarding the -sdk suffix
> > that I'm not aware of? Shouldn't those packages be named -devel?
It's not a policy, but xorg-x11-server-sdk is the package name, that
other distributors use for these files as well. I'm not aware of
anyone using xorg-x11-server-devel. I don't see much benefit for
renaming it besides from confusing our customers by constantling
renaming our X11 packages.
Best regards,
Stefan
Public Key available
------------------------------------------------------
Stefan Dirsch (Res. & Dev.) SUSE LINUX Products GmbH
Tel: 0911-740 53 0 Maxfeldstraße 5
FAX: 0911-740 53 479 D-90409 Nürnberg
http://www.suse.de Germany
-----------------------------------------------------------------
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF: Markus Rex, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg)
-----------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx
| < Previous | Next > |