Mailinglist Archive: opensuse-packaging (105 mails)
| < Previous | Next > |
Re: [opensuse-packaging] rpmlint checks in Factory
- From: Michal Marek <mmarek@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 12:00:00 +0200
- Message-id: <465410A0.3090306@xxxxxxx>
Dirk Mueller wrote:
> On Wednesday, 23. May 2007, Michal Marek wrote:
>
>> This is one too strict: There are -examples or -doc subpackages with
>> example source files, which is perfectly valid IMHO (we don't want to
>> put them into -devel directly in order not to bloat buildroots.
>
> You're right, I've also noticed it. Please file a bugreport so that I do not
> forget to fix the check.
done: https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=277317
>> Second, why sum the score for multiple instances of the same check?
>> Right now a package with 20+ *.c files will fail :(
>
> which package are you looking at?
swig of course ;-) But eg. kdevelop3 has the same problem.
Michal
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> On Wednesday, 23. May 2007, Michal Marek wrote:
>
>> This is one too strict: There are -examples or -doc subpackages with
>> example source files, which is perfectly valid IMHO (we don't want to
>> put them into -devel directly in order not to bloat buildroots.
>
> You're right, I've also noticed it. Please file a bugreport so that I do not
> forget to fix the check.
done: https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=277317
>> Second, why sum the score for multiple instances of the same check?
>> Right now a package with 20+ *.c files will fail :(
>
> which package are you looking at?
swig of course ;-) But eg. kdevelop3 has the same problem.
Michal
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx
| < Previous | Next > |