Am Thursday 15 March 2007 schrieb Juergen Weigert:
On Mar 15, 07 14:53:50 +0100, Richard Guenther wrote:
On Thu, 15 Mar 2007, Stanislav Brabec wrote:
Hallo.
I have just notified, that many people "fix" (i. e. break) their packages to pass QA checks by removing required files instead of fixing them, i. e. removing .desktop files instead of installing icon or fixing Categories, removing gconf schemas instead of correct installation.
If they "fix" or "break" their package what does it help to add a comment? It looks like you are proposing that package maintainers have a clue ;)
No. Especially cluelessness needs documentation. Example: "# I don't care about this gconf stuff. Remove seems to help."
This is a very useful comment. It pinpoints the actual problem that the maintainer has.
Yeah, what good is this comment then? Unless of course the build team sees itself in a position that it has to be too much time, so it wants to verify the clueness of all packager comments. I doubt it. Greetings, Stephan -- SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF: Markus Rex, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+help@opensuse.org