Mailinglist Archive: opensuse-packaging (53 mails)
| < Previous | Next > |
Re: [opensuse-packaging] Updates of packages (right numbering scheme?)
- From: "Dominique Leuenberger" <Dominique.Leuenberger@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2006 13:32:40 +0200
- Message-id: <s5362df4.013@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> Marcus Meissner <meissner@xxxxxxx> 18-10-2006 14:24 >>>
On Wed, Oct 18, 2006 at 01:26:30PM +0200, Dominique Leuenberger wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have created packages for SuperTuxKart 0.2rc2 and then for
> SuperTuxKart 0.2 (obsoleteing 0.2rc2) (only home: repo up to now)
>
> RUG and other tools don't recognize 0.2 being newer as 0.2rc2
>
> What suggestion can you give me for future Numbering schemes of
> RC-Releases?
>
>The upstream project should do so...
>
>0.1.99rc2 I would have used for the RC ;)
Thanks Marcus,
I'll get in touch with the upstream maintainers for this.
Hopefully for the next release, it will be adopted.
Would 0.2.0 be treated newer as 0.2rc2?
Dominique
| < Previous | Next > |