Mailinglist Archive: opensuse-packaging (70 mails)
| < Previous | Next > |
Re: [opensuse-packaging] Signing RPM packages in 10.1
- From: Marcus Meissner <meissner@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 2 May 2006 14:07:01 +0200
- Message-id: <20060502120701.GB29429@xxxxxxx>
On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 02:00:51PM +0200, Marcel Hilzinger wrote:
> Am Dienstag, 2. Mai 2006 13:07 schrieb Marcus Meissner:
> > On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 12:06:51PM +0200, Marcel Hilzinger wrote:
> > > Do 10.1 packages have to be signed by default?
> >
> > We *may* check the package signatures.
> >
> > Currently I think we do not check them, but we might change that.
> So if I start to create Suse packages for 10.1 it's a good idea to sign them,
> right?
Yes. It is always a good idea to do so and its just a:
rpm --resign / --addsign *.rpm
command anyway.
Ciao, Marcus
> Am Dienstag, 2. Mai 2006 13:07 schrieb Marcus Meissner:
> > On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 12:06:51PM +0200, Marcel Hilzinger wrote:
> > > Do 10.1 packages have to be signed by default?
> >
> > We *may* check the package signatures.
> >
> > Currently I think we do not check them, but we might change that.
> So if I start to create Suse packages for 10.1 it's a good idea to sign them,
> right?
Yes. It is always a good idea to do so and its just a:
rpm --resign / --addsign *.rpm
command anyway.
Ciao, Marcus
| < Previous | Next > |