Mailinglist Archive: opensuse-packaging (70 mails)
| < Previous | Next > |
Re: [opensuse-packaging] Signing RPM packages in 10.1
- From: Marcel Hilzinger <mhilzinger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 2 May 2006 14:00:51 +0200
- Message-id: <200605021400.52039.mhilzinger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Am Dienstag, 2. Mai 2006 13:07 schrieb Marcus Meissner:
> On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 12:06:51PM +0200, Marcel Hilzinger wrote:
> > Do 10.1 packages have to be signed by default?
>
> We *may* check the package signatures.
>
> Currently I think we do not check them, but we might change that.
So if I start to create Suse packages for 10.1 it's a good idea to sign them,
right?
--
Mit freundlichen Grüßen,
Marcel Hilzinger
Linux New Media AG
Süskindstr. 4
D-81929 München
Tel: +49 (89) 99 34 11 0
Fax: +49 (89) 99 34 11 99
> On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 12:06:51PM +0200, Marcel Hilzinger wrote:
> > Do 10.1 packages have to be signed by default?
>
> We *may* check the package signatures.
>
> Currently I think we do not check them, but we might change that.
So if I start to create Suse packages for 10.1 it's a good idea to sign them,
right?
--
Mit freundlichen Grüßen,
Marcel Hilzinger
Linux New Media AG
Süskindstr. 4
D-81929 München
Tel: +49 (89) 99 34 11 0
Fax: +49 (89) 99 34 11 99
| < Previous | Next > |