Mailinglist Archive: opensuse-packaging (60 mails)
| < Previous | Next > |
Re: [opensuse-packaging] Re: [opensuse-factory] Re: gcc 3.x compatibility package
- From: Adrian Schröter <adrian@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2006 09:36:37 +0100
- Message-id: <200603130936.46084.adrian@xxxxxxx>
Am Friday 10 March 2006 19:41 schrieb Robert Schiele:
> On Fri, Mar 10, 2006 at 03:33:05PM +0100, Adrian Schroeter wrote:
> > the should be under the same prefix IMHO. The should not be in some
> > standard lib path to avoid clashes with existing gcc4 build libs. This
> > means also that
>
> Nah, that is what shared library versioning is for. Putting runtime
> libraries in an extra directory is only needed if the author of the
> software did not understand how to do shared library versioning correctly.
so you plan to extend the version by some $gcc3 extension ?
But this would break already compiled binaries (esp. binary only apps).
--
Adrian Schroeter
SUSE Linux Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nuernberg, Germany
email: adrian@xxxxxxx
> On Fri, Mar 10, 2006 at 03:33:05PM +0100, Adrian Schroeter wrote:
> > the should be under the same prefix IMHO. The should not be in some
> > standard lib path to avoid clashes with existing gcc4 build libs. This
> > means also that
>
> Nah, that is what shared library versioning is for. Putting runtime
> libraries in an extra directory is only needed if the author of the
> software did not understand how to do shared library versioning correctly.
so you plan to extend the version by some $gcc3 extension ?
But this would break already compiled binaries (esp. binary only apps).
--
Adrian Schroeter
SUSE Linux Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nuernberg, Germany
email: adrian@xxxxxxx
| < Previous | Next > |